OUR SERVICE
Can An Employee Sue For Wrongful Termination In California If They Were Fired For Reporting Illegal Activities Or Engaging In whistleblowing?
Trusted Wrongful Termination California Lawyers!
You pay nothing unless we win.
Have you been fired for unlawful reasons in California?
Speak with a lawyer today!
Call the lawyers you can trust to fight for the justice and compensation that you deserve!
Wrongful Termination California will fight for the largest verdict or settlement possible.
- Can An Employee Sue For Wrongful Termination In California If They Were Fired For Reporting Illegal Activities Or Engaging In whistleblowing?
You pay nothing unless we win.
In California, employees are protected by strong laws that encourage the reporting of illegal activities and protect whistleblowers from retaliation. Wrongful termination occurs when an employee is unlawfully fired for engaging in protected activities, such as reporting illegal activities or blowing the whistle on wrongdoing. This article explores the legal protections available to employees in California who face retaliation for reporting illegal activities, as well as the potential grounds for a wrongful termination lawsuit.
I. Understanding Whistleblowing and Reporting Illegal Activities:
a) Whistleblowing Defined:
Whistleblowing refers to the act of an employee reporting or disclosing illegal activities, unethical behavior, or violations of laws or regulations within their organization or to appropriate authorities.
b) Reporting Illegal Activities:
Employees have the right to report any illegal activities they witness in their workplace, including violations of state or federal laws, health and safety regulations, fraud, or discrimination.
II. Protected Activities under California Law:
California Whistleblower Protection Laws:
California has robust whistleblower protection laws that shield employees from retaliation when they engage in certain protected activities. These laws include:
- California Labor Code §1102.5: Protects employees from retaliation for disclosing information to a government or law enforcement agency about a violation of state or federal law.
- California Government Code §12940: Prohibits retaliation against employees who oppose any practices prohibited by the Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA), such as discrimination, harassment, or retaliation.
III. Grounds for Wrongful Termination Lawsuits:
a) Violation of Public Policy:
Employees who are fired for engaging in protected activities, such as reporting illegal activities, may have grounds for a wrongful termination lawsuit based on the violation of public policy.
b) Retaliation for Whistleblowing:
Employees who face adverse employment actions, such as termination, demotion, or harassment, as a result of whistleblowing may be able to sue their employer for wrongful termination.
IV. Proving Wrongful Termination for Whistleblowing:
a) Causation:
To establish a wrongful termination claim, the employee must show a causal connection between their protected activity (whistleblowing) and the adverse employment action (termination).
b) Direct Evidence:
Direct evidence, such as explicit statements or documents, showing that the termination was directly linked to the employee’s protected activity, can strengthen the wrongful termination claim.
c) Circumstantial Evidence:
Circumstantial evidence, such as the timing of the termination following the protected activity, patterns of retaliation within the organization, or inconsistent reasons provided for the termination, can help establish a causal connection.
V. Remedies for Wrongful Termination:
a) Reinstatement and Back Pay:
If an employee successfully proves wrongful termination, they may be entitled to reinstatement to their former position and receive back pay for lost wages during the period of unemployment.
b) Compensatory Damages:
Compensatory damages may be awarded to the employee to compensate for emotional distress, mental anguish, damage to reputation, and other non-economic losses caused by the wrongful termination.
c) Punitive Damages:
In cases involving particularly egregious conduct by the employer, punitive damages may be awarded to punish the employer and deter similar behavior in the future.
VI. Additional Legal Protections:
a) Whistleblower Retaliation Claims under Other Laws:
Employees who report specific types of illegal activities may also be protected by federal laws such as the False Claims Act, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, or the Dodd-Frank Act, which provide additional protections against retaliation.
b) California’s Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA):
PAGA allows employees to file lawsuits on behalf of themselves and other aggrieved employees to recover civil penalties for labor code violations, including retaliation for whistleblowing.
Conclusion:
In California, employees who are fired for reporting illegal activities or engaging in whistleblowing are protected by strong laws. Wrongful termination lawsuits can be filed when an employee is unlawfully terminated as a result of engaging in protected activities. These lawsuits can result in remedies such as reinstatement, back pay, compensatory damages, and even punitive damages in some cases. If you believe you have been wrongfully terminated for reporting illegal activities, consulting with an experienced employment law attorney is essential to understand your rights and pursue appropriate legal action.
Have You Been Fired For Unlawful Reasons In California?
We will fight so you can settle for more!
Request A Free Consultation
The Time to Act is Now
Act now for a free consultation from our top-rated legal team to discuss any rights or compensation that you may be entitled.
We will fight to get the maximum compensation owed to you for your injuries and losses.
(888) 301-9971
Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. The information you obtain at this website is not, nor is it intended to be, legal advice. You should consult an attorney for advice regarding your individual situation. We invite you to contact us and welcome your calls or communications. However, contacting us does not create an attorney-client relationship. Please do not send any confidential information to us unless and until an attorney-client relationship has been established, which will be via a signed, written, retainer agreement. This website contains articles and commentary regarding certain jury verdicts. However, a jury verdict often does not reflect the actual amount that a plaintiff receives. Judges often reduce jury awards. Sometimes Judges add attorneys’ fees and other damages to awards. As a result, final awards or settlements, are often for different amounts than the amount awarded by the jury. Many of the jury awards discussed on the website, ended up being dramatically reduced. The depictions on the website that portray lawyers/clients are models and are not the actual lawyers/clients of the firm. The scenes depicted on this website are fictionalized.